Martes, Marso 13, 2012

anecdote "tagalog"



story:1 Kakainin pa rin

Dalawang matandang lalaki ang magkatabi ng  higaan ng isang pangpasaherong barko papuntang Manila mula Cebu. Ang isa nagbabasa ng bibliya at ang isa ay kinakausap ang isang makulit na apo.

Lolo 1:
 Tandaan mo lagi ang sasabilin ko sa iyo  na oras na makatulog ako ay wag kang maglalapit sa tabi ng  barko at baka ka mahulog,dahil pag-nahulog ka kahit marunong kapang lumangoy tiyak pagpipistahan ka parin ng mga pating, ( ang ,ika nito sa apo.)

Lolo 2:
 Iyan ang hirap sa mga katoliko, pati pating pagpipistahin pa niyo,ako brod,kahit malunod pa itong barko buo ang paniniwala ko na hindi ako kakainin ng pating dahil lagi kong kasama ang Panginoong Hesus
,iyan ang nasasabi dito sa bibliya.

Lolo 1: Mawalang galang na po, ano po bang relihiyon niyo?

Lolo 2: Ah...Akoy Saksi ni Jehova at...( magsasalita pa sana ito pero sumingit ang batang makulit ).

Apo ni lolo 1: Bakit lo,sino ba iyong Hesus na sabi niyang kasama niya, eh...nagiisa lang naman siya?

lolo 1: Hindi iyong nakikita espiritu lang iyon.

apo : bakit  iyon bang pating lo, kumakain ba ng espiritu?

lolo 1: Syempre hindi, eh hindi nga nakikita iyon papaano kainin?.

apo ; Pero iyong pating lo, kumakain parin ng tao?

lolo 1: Syempre..

Apo : Eh di kainin parin siya ng pating lo?,..

Lolo 1; Tumingin muna sa katabing matanda na medyo nakangiti bago sumagot,"ah..sigurado".




GOD'S ROUND SQUARE

Sagdi lang:

One of the questions in my  previous post within the "question and answer" portion was based on the angel's affirmation to Mary  ( Luke 1:37 ). that in God nothing is impossible.

Question: If  God  is Almighty, and nothing is impossible for Him, then does your ( catholic/christian) God makes round square?

The first time I heard this question in Freedom Park ( Freedom Park is in Cebu city) I watched closely how   Catholic  answered  such a stupid question. They have very witty answers. Someone answered: Do not relate man's stupidity to God. in God everything is in order  and  He  shall not entertain illogical questions  etc... But  as  I  observe  it  seems  that  all  answers  will  sum  up  to  not entertaining illogical questions  like this. But for  me, giving those kind of reasons are just a roundabout way of escaping the question. And if I were to be asked, I'd answer yes God can make the round square. If he ask me to show how God's  it looks like, I'll ask  him also , that if he let me do the task of God in making round square as an example, then I'll show  him ( just an example on how God make  it) Otherwise if  he will not let me, he  will  never see how round square  look  like. The moment he let me, then I'll start sketching any sort of  form in the  paper give it to him, and tell him that, that is how round square  look   like.  If  he summon stupidity things I did, I'll tell him not, perhaps the stupidity is in his question, cause if you  do not believe God why keep asking God's authority in making all  things possible. Why? Is he expecting something square or round, while he  ask round square form?  Perhaps  what will appear in any sort of form is God's prerogative, and it is no longer in the form of  square neither round but to the combination of the square and round and remember we (catholic /christian) do not question God's manifestation.

example:

a) orange and yellow = yellow orange
b) black and white = gray
c) square and round = round square " it is no longer square neither it is round "

Others:

When the Catholic says that there is God, that we ( catholic /protestant/ christian ) believe every  manifestation of God, that in God lies a mystery , and His ( God ) work of art and fashion is so deep that common human intellect would hardly understand, does it mean that catholic teaching does not assert the truth,  cause it teaches something in-comprehensive even to their belief?

When John ask his friend Sam if he knows Peter, Sam answered "Oh ! Peter ? I could hardly understand him, his moody, one time he's okay, the next time you'll find him not."

Does Sam answer expresses that he knew Peter  less ?  Of course not. Instead, his answer proves that he knows well of Peter.

When we (Catholic) affirm that understanding God is beyond human knowledge, it is a catholic self-proclamation  that we know Him ( God ) well. That we adhere and rely God's transcendence and authority. That we know our limitation in dealing God's supremacy .